Tom bird lorna anderson3/16/2024 ![]() ![]() In these two consolidated appeals, New England argues that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the issue of procurement in excluding certain evidence and testimony at trial and (No. New England was held liable for the full amount of the policy. At the conclusion of trial on August 28, 1987, the jury found that the policy had not been fraudulently procured. She later disclaimed any interest in the proceeds, and prosecuted the counterclaim on behalf of the four minor children of the marriage. Lorna Anderson Eldridge, Martin Anderson's widow (since remarried) who was a defendant below, filed a counterclaim seeking the policy proceeds. New England Mutual Life Insurance Company brought this diversity action seeking a declaratory judgment that it was not obligated to pay $270,000 under an insurance policy issued on the life of Martin Anderson because the policy had been fraudulently procured. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |